peter_wise2001 wrote (on the XpMailingList): ''For an upcoming job interview, I have spent much time today finding out about XP. I recognise that it would seem to solve many of the problems that, in my experience, have beset software development:'' * ''The dangers of concentration on the abstract at the requirements/design stage of the software development cycle.'' * ''The necessity of reiteration in the cycle and in parts of the cycle.'' * ''The loneliness the programmer and the stress caused by code reviews.'' * ''The difficulty in tracking true progress.'' * ''Lack of regular customer involvement and the risk of "making the wrong product" for the customer.'' The U''''''sualSuspects replied: * I'm JustaProgrammer. All I want to do in life is code, eat, have relations, and sleep. Each following BestPractice''''''s. * Without a team practicing XP, or similar BestPractice''''''s, I can't just code. * The team enforces worst practices that cause "ProcessWaste", then they enforce other worst practices to clean up. Observed bottlenecks to productivity: * My colleague ** wrote a class I can't fix ** delayed integration, causing bugs * My team ** does not run DailyBuild''''''s ** does not maintain CommonBuildEnvironment''''''s ** does not run my tests every 10 edits ** treats test failures as bugs I caused by testing too much ** insists on using languages like VisualBasic that resist flow; by locking up the editor each time you run the TestSuite ** insists on using languages like PerlLanguage that resist refactoring ** culture equates "ReFactor''''''ing" with "rework" and "adding bugs", despite overwhelming evidence that fewer code lines makes for less bugs and easier upgrades ** strictly limits my ability to converse with a real "customer", because I might freak them out * Code without tests derails my code (with tests), so I must run the debugger I was trying to avoid * Other team members (and management) don't agree that running the automated tests is a requirement for checking in the code. So they regularly change the code "away" from the tests, breaking them. And I don't have the time to do "the other half" of their jobs. * My boss ** ordered my colleague not to sit next to me and help ** ordered me not to check my tests into the house version control system, because "we already have too many modules in it" (mostly CodeFork''''''s) [FearOfAddingClasses] ** tells me my time estimates instead of the other way around ** refuses to prioritize features in business order, "because you might get the architecture wrong" * Our customers refuse to accept frequent releases because they are familiar with vendors using them as their free Quality Control teams XP is a BulletOfaVeryShinyMaterial, that is known to slay all those lycanthropes. ---- CategoryExtremeProgramming