''Augmentation of the Intellect'' (http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/augment.html) by Martin Ryder
(May, 1994)

This is an attempt then to assess the impact of the internet.

'''Abstract:'''

''This article characterizes the Internet as a powerful constructivist environment for learning. It is an organic system which grows and responds to human participation. A virtual library, the Internet provides abundant information resources. But unlike a library, the Net is a potent environment for generative learning where participants, through interaction, add value to the resources they exploit. The flexibility of collaborative environments provides scaffolding for learners in times of rapid change where standard instructional approaches can be less than adequate. The power of the Net is exploited by crafted learners using collaborative strategies and sophisticated cognitive tools.''

I thought it was interesting to get a perspective from that stage in the development of the internet, where web tools are still in their infancy. I found the article when searching for information on PauloFriere. ''Note that some links in the article are now dead.'' -- JohnFletcher
----

It is unbelievable that that paper didn't bother to mention DougEngelbart's 1962 "AUGMENTING HUMAN INTELLECT: A Conceptual Framework" (http://www.bootstrap.org/augdocs/friedewald030402/augmentinghumanintellect/ahi62index.html), since AugmentationOfTheIntellect wasn't just the focus of that one early paper, it was the overt point of all of Englebart's research, including his famous 1968 TheMotherOfAllDemos.

See also "Internet Pioneers: Doug Engelbart" at http://www.ibiblio.org/pioneers/englebart.html for more on that.

P.S. 1994 was early for the '''WorldWideWeb''', it was not early for the Internet. 

-- DougMerritt

Heh. I'm not sure that ''network'' (ie, internet) research was aimed at augmenting the individual intellect. Computing research was but network research had slightly different aims. Near as I can figure, computing research such as Doug Engelbart's was focused primarily on the individual whereas network research was focused on the society, if it can be said to have been focused at all. For instance, the concepts of HumanNets or the WorldNet are entirely social and have no meaning in terms of 'augmenting the human intellect'. John, I think you corrected your initial statement in the wrong way, though it appears that Doug corrected it. -- RK

----

See AugmentingHumanIntellect and DougEngelbart

CategoryArticle