Seems to overlap with JavaDiscussion.

----

'''Pros'''

* Does not slow your computer speed
** ''Huh?''
* Free
* The syntax is familiar to the myriad programmers that know any other C based language.
* Java (the platform) has a very large and standard class library, some parts of which are very well written.
* Java provides a platform for behavioral transfer from one address space to another. This is particularly evident in the dynamic class loading mechanisms of RMI (Remote Method Invocation).
* Automatic Memory Management implemented by GarbageCollection and NoExplicitPointers
* NoExplicitPointers
* Explicit Interfaces
* Improving performance (especially under HotSpot and IbmJava)
* Good portability (certainly better than that of nearly any compiled alternative)
* Simplified syntax (compared to C++)
* Language design not committee driven
* Comprehensive documentation
* Lots of available code and third-party libraries
* Lots of different choices between JavaIde''''''s which don't tie you into a specific Java implementation.
* If you love OOP, the only way to write functions is to make them class methods.
* No FragileBinaryInterfaceProblem.
* Many standard interfaces defined in the standard library, which would have been vendor/OS specifc otherwise, helps a lot in achieving portability and ease integration/selection of 3rd party libraries.  E.g. JDBC, JMS, JCE, JAI, serial I/O, JAXP, JNDI, etc.  Some have correspondance in other languages (e.g. ODBC) but not all.
----

'''Cons'''

* Much of the Java code as written by experienced coders turns out to be boilerplate. This has led to the charge that Java code is object-oriented Cobol.
* If you dislike OOP or used mixed paradigms, the only way to write functions is to make them class methods.
* Some people think the class libraries are poorly written.
* As with all languages, getting used to the syntax conventions takes a while for those who come from other backgrounds.
* Some people think that CheckedExceptionsAreOfDubiousValue
* Some people wish for keyword or default arguments to functions
* Some people miss closures (see SmalltalkMinusMinus, although BlocksInJava is a good (?) fallback)
* Some people want destructors that are guaranteed to be called. (See FinalizeInsteadOfProperDestructor)
* Poor garbage collection in some implementations/applications.
* Lack of garbage collection on resources other than memory (see FinalizeInsteadOfProperDestructor)
* Type system forces programmers to hard-code knowledge of types in multiple places throughout the code -- see Conrad Weisert's article on the topic in http://www.idinews.com/casts.html
* Large memory footprint
* Requires an interpreter. It is still difficult to deliver a self-contained application  [If you feel that this has changed, please give us convincing information on "StandaloneJavaApplications" so we can delete this point.]
* If you aren't careful, you can write slow programs. Of course, you can do this in any language.
* Bugs in library implementations (especially Swing)
* Bugs in JVM implementations (all JVMs are not created equal). This isn't Java's fault, but it has been known to limit Java's usefulness.
* Proprietary language (i.e., not committee driven). There have only been a few events that could be construed as Sun [now Oracle] abusing this power, and the JavaCommunityProcess (http://jcp.org) helps a lot. The main reason why people dislike this is because of what it "could" lead to.
* Primitive types don't inherit from Object. This is a decision the language designers made on purpose, and never causes problems that can't be worked around. Still, it robs the less intelligent of us of that cosy feeling of consistency. ''And it frequently necessitates special-case code. See java.util.Arrays for example.''
* No generic programming means no StronglyTypedCollection''''''s unless you write 'em yourself one at a time.
* Immutable types are a damn poor substitute for restricted references.
* Difficult to blur distinction between class and object when desired, which increases the need/want for HOF's.

----
''Some of the above is moved from JavaIsDead''

A couple points:
	* IBM is putting a ''lot'' of work into Java. The IbmJava JVM implementations are impressive and improving steadily.
	* Much of Java's performance problems can be traced to the unfortunate use of DoubleBufferedGraphicsInJava.
----
Please try to keep discussion of these bullets on pages centered on the bullet point, not on this page.
Post flames in JavaIsaDeadEnd and JavaIsDead
----
CategoryJava