Here are some examples of MixIn''''''s for CeePlusPlus

----
In the context of C++ [CeePlusPlus] the term mixin is usually used to match BjarneStroustrup's definition:
	 :	''A class that provides some - but not all - of the implementation for a virtual base class is often called a "mixin".''

You can for example have a virtual abstract base class that defines the interfaces for the import and export of values and a flock of derived classes that implement different means to either export or import, but not both. Then you can combine these second-layer classes to form different concrete classes.
----

I believe that it's possible to MixIn from above (parent classes) or MixIn from below (AbstractSubclass''''''es).  The above example shows an example of MixIn from the parent classes through MultipleInheritance.  For CeePlusPlus, AbstractSubclass''''''es written by UsingTemplates.

----

'''Examples for MixIn through AbstractSubclass'''

The following code implements the SingletonPattern

 template<class S''''''ingletonClass>

 class Singleton : public S''''''ingletonClass
 {
  public:
    /** Singleton creation function */
    static Singleton & instance()
    {
      if(_instance.get() == NULL)
      {
        _instance = auto_ptr<Singleton<S''''''ingletonClass> >(new Singleton);
        assert(_instance.get() != NULL);
      }
      return *_instance;
    }

  protected:
    /** Singleton instance holder */
    static auto_ptr<Singleton<S''''''ingletonClass> > _instance;
 };

 /** static instance definition */

 template<class S''''''ingletonClass> auto_ptr<Singleton<S''''''ingletonClass> > Singleton<S''''''ingletonClass>::_instance;

If we have a class called M''''''yClass:

 class M''''''yClass
 {
  public:
    virtual void bar();
    virtual ~M''''''yClass();
  protected:
    M''''''yClass();
 };

The constructor can either be public or protected depending on the need.  A protected constructor can ensure that the class will only be possible to be constructed by subclasses in this case the Singleton MixIn.

The MixIn can be used like:

 void foo()
 {
   Singleton<M''''''yClass>::instance().bar();
 }

or

 class S''''''ingletonMyClass : public Singleton<M''''''yClass>
 {
 };

 void foo()
 {
   S''''''ingletonMyClass::instance().bar();
 }

The STL's auto_ptr is used to ensure proper destruction.  In this example, the abstract method this MixIn requires from the parent class is the default constructor.  The disadvantage is that it is harder to pass parameters through constructor, but the advantage is OnceAndOnlyOnce because any class can be a singleton by mixing in the AbstractSubclass without rewriting the same code.