A slightly HumptyDumpty term for a description of software that may or may not actually have been implemented, in a way that should be true of any implementation. 

Of an object type, an informal but precise description (verbal or otherwise) of that type's contracts; thus the SuperAbstract description of the Collection interface would be "represents a group of objects". 

Of a framework, the set of such descriptions for the types providing the essential functionality. 

A SuperAbstract description should
* make minimal assumptions about possible implementation languages or platforms
* be complete enough nonetheless to be the basis of a concrete implementation
* not trespass on PatternLanguage by prescribing detailed mechanisms or algorithms

-- DavidWright