I know from literature that Templates can be used for reflection in CeePlusPlus. I am looking for some details about implementation strategies. -- JohnFletcher Reference: Giuseppe Attardi & Antonio Cisternino "Reflection Support by means of template metaprogramming" see http://www.di.unipi.it/~attardi/ I have also found this implementation by Konstantin Knizhnik http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/cppreflection/docs/reflect.html It's probably also worth looking at the boost type traits library at http://www.boost.org/libs/type_traits/index.htm ---- Re the Knizhnik page, it is actually possible (although not pleasant) to extract this information at run-time from a C++ class, provided the members are wrapped slightly. This avoids having the RunTimeTypeInformation registration stuff being included in a cpp file. This means it will work for templated classes that use their parameters to declare members. I do have this code working, but I'm still writing up the technique in an understandable way. -- KatieLucas That's interesting.... do tell... give us a hint? -- BillWeston ---- Another way (used in several libraries) is partial template specialization. This is a poor example but can be generalized. This may not be the best way to do this: template std::string type(const T&); template <> std::string type(const int&) { return std::string("int"); } template <> std::string type(const double&) { return std::string("double"); } void main() { int n = 0; double d = 0.0; std::cout << type(n) << std::endl << type(d) << std::endl; } Disadvantages: user must create specializations for all reflected types. Of course, you may be able to get an existing library for standard types. BoostLibraries include a type traits library, the standard library has numeric_limits<>, etc. Advantages: specialization creates a policy as to which types reflect that will be caught at compile time. ---- CategoryCpp CategoryCppTemplates CategoryReflection TemplateMetafunctionHasFunction