I've always felt that Top 10 lists weren't a good idea for web sites because they tend to self-preserve themselves. Everyone reads the top 10 sites so those sites get the most hits and end up staying on top 10... $0.02.
-- PatNotes

I find it a bit disturbing that RecentChanges and the five or so newest pages seem to be on TopTen continuously.
-- OleAndersen

I think the last 2,000 hits is too small of a sample. None of the real pages have more than 20 hits. Maybe 10,000 would yield more interesting results? -- JimLittle

''I'd like to know the time period for which the log is sampled. There is a starting time given at the beginning of the page, but what kind of time is this: universal or local, and if local, then which zone?''

Why not reveal the ''bottom'' ten, as measured over a long period? Might indicate what needs some dusting off. -- EdwardKiser

Or better yet, the ''oldest'' ten, measured by the last time they were { edited | read }.  (See AncientChanges.)

Having a list of the BottomTen pages would be a great feature. While a TopTen is self-preserving (not just on websites, either - how about PopChart''''''s?), a BottomTen would be changing constantly, since people would be checking out the BottomTen, thus removing them from the list. -- AalbertTorsius

I like this idea, but for a possibly different reason. A list of all WikiPage''''''s sorted from least recently edited at the top would be an interesting view of "core" Wiki.
----
See TopTen, ManualTopTen, many other IndexingScheme''''''s